Which classes are you in?

The person who is obsessed with a single product is unlikely to get the best value for their money.

The employer who is obsessed with an employee is unlikely to get the most labor for their work.

The woman who is obsessed with one man is unlikely to be treated the best any man could treat her.

Sometimes, the lack of value or labor or treatment isn't out of malice.

...

The person who can choose multiple similar products can choose a product which offers them the best value for their money.

The employer who can choose multiple employees can choose an employee who gives the more labor at a lower cost.

The woman who chooses multiple men can be offerred more value than a woman focused on one man.

Sometimes, the chooser is wrong.

...

The employer who chooses multiple employees, and receives more labor for a lower cost
- is unlikely to obsess about
- an employee who chooses multiple employers, and receives more money for less labor.

The employer who chooses multiple employees,
- is using the same decision-making process as
- an employee who chooses multiple employers.

These entities are in the same "decision-making" class and do not interact with eachother.

These entities interact with "obsessors" to gain the most value from them.

The "obsessors" are receiving the least amount of value.

So, this creates a class of "non-obsessors" who do not harm eachother, and "obsessors" who act as individuals.

...

Suppose there exists morals where

• some people advocate the morals for others, but do not adhere to the morals themselves (i.e. "hypocrites")
• some people may or may not advocate the morals for others, and also adhere to the morals (i.e. "moral-adherents").
• some people have no morals (i.e. "guiltless")

A hypocrite cannot take advantage of another hypocrite or guiltless in certain situations.

A hypocrite must interact with a moral-adherent to gain an advantage.

A moral-adherent cannot take advantage of anyone, but does not interact with the guiltless.

A guiltless can take advantage of the moral-adherent, but the moral-adherents avoid them.

So, this creates a class of "hypocrites" who do not harm eachother, and "moral-adherents" and "guiltless" who act as individuals.

Which class do you want to be in?

...

Suppose there exists

• a class of people who make laws, but do not enforce them against themselves
• a class of people who make laws, and enforce them against everyone
• and
• a class of people who do not make laws, but enforce them.
• a class of people who do not make laws, and dont enforce them

Which class do you want to be in?

Suppose there exists in dating

• a class of people who advocate for rules , but do not follow them
• a class of people who do not advocate for rules, and do not follow other peoples' rules
• a class of people who advocate for rules, and follow them
• a class of people who do not advocate for rules, but follow them at their detriment.

Which class do you want to be in?

Suppose there exists

• a class of people who care about others approval, but others approve them based on their existence
• a class of people who care about others approval, but others approve them based on their output
• a class of people who do not care about others approval, but others approve them based on their existence
• a class of people who do not care about others approval, but others approve them based on their output

Which class do you want to be in?